Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc. (Non-Profit)

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage; Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government

 

 

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government by Dean A. Ayers The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA Today. We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals. Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions: Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking. A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USA the licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal. Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:” Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept. Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world. A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds: Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979). Doing Away with Dog Ownership: All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto, and those of us who have traditionally grown our own food or owned animals personally for various reasons will be locked out or the owners will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc. Read the rest of the article NationalDogPress Copyright © 2009 - 2010   Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc.

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

The Impact of Animal Rights, Rescues, and Shelters on Animal Law

Where is the “over-population” when dogs and cats are transported across state lines and imported from foreign countries to fill up animal shelters?

 

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress  © 

2 January 2010

If your job has already been axed by the bad economy or is about to disappear, people can often do desperate things in an attempt to compensate.

Why should animal shelters be any different; especially when a person considers what is happing inside these organizations, many of which are run by animal rights activists and major big dollar supported nonprofit groups. Some are so passionate that they'd do nearly anything to keep their "humane society imperative" of their animal shelter/rescue agenda going. This information can assist in explaining why pet and animal "over-population stigma” is used as a marketing ploy for rescue and adoption industry to sell their agenda about dogs and cats (rescued for a fee) as being their alleged heroic duty of serving rescued and adopted out dogs and cats.

Tell a family that the dog they're interested in is about to be destroyed by euthanasia due to "lack of space", and the deal to adopt is closed. Another dog is then shipped in to take its place as the needed “chattel product” of this high dollar big animal “industry and nonprofit business” nationwide.

After mulling over the phenomenally successful statistics of voluntary spay/neuter by the general public, the question need to be asked; where are all the animal shelters/rescues getting their dogs? Regardless of the facts that most shelter dogs are adult dogs, sadly displaced for many reasons, like due to people moving to covenant-controlled homeowner associations and counties cities with extreme “pet limit” laws, the numbers in shelters do not add up.

Obviously, shelters should be going “out of business” left and right since voluntary spay/neuter nationwide is so successful. After a cursory review of nationwide available statistics it appears that animal euthanasia numbers have been increasing for 20 years, especially to eradicate the “bully breeds” yet, "over-population" is the “mantra” still used by animal shelters and animal rescues favoring their animal rights agendas for furthering their fund-raising, donations, and adopting for a fee (selling) dogs industry to an ill-informed public.

Even the numbers of irresponsible breeding “puppy mills” are nothing like people think it is. The animal rights groups nationwide have succumbed to now including “responsible” dog kennels with more than 50 dogs in perfect care and control conditions as being labeled as “puppy mills” now in their propaganda. Considering the successful voluntary rate of spay/neuter nationwide, it is highly unlikely that accidental pet owner breeding and true defined “puppy mill” irresponsible breeding are filling up animal shelters/rescues to the extent that animal rights groups and animal shelters/rescues claim they are. However, a nationwide dog “chattel” product for a fee industry(dog and cat rescues/adoptions) must come from somewhere.

 

Make a $$$ Profit (nonprofit) killing or be killed by euthanasia

The general public and all pet and animal owners need to be aware that Animal Rightists lobby with local Animal Shelters and Animal Rescues as “cover.”

The illegal, immoral and illicit care, cruelty and unethical practices in the shelter industry are shocking.  And make no mistake, it is a BIG DOLLAR ($$$) rescue/adoption for a fee industry.  Many animal rescues and shelters have become some of the most profitable pet shops around that kill anything that does not bring top dollar; or is too much work to place in adoption programs for an adoption or rescue fee. To “give away” a dog or cat, is politically incorrect and unacceptable in their animal rights agenda “chattel” industry. The only Animal Rescue/Shelter agenda acceptable for an “unadoptable” (for a fee) dog or cat is euthanasia, heralded as being so humane.

Single Breed and Pure Bred Rescue organizations have a dreadful time getting pure bred dogs and cats out of the shelter for a fee industry system, simply because shelters/rescues exploit these pure breeds to increase sales and profits (in the hundreds of dollars for a single pure bred dog or cat). Sadly, the “main stream” news media and general public have been willing to look the other way, always promoting the animal rights agenda “cause and effect” of these shelter and rescue illicit industry dog product “chattel” practices.

Why do some humane society shelters operate in this manner?

The answer is that many animal shelters and humane society agencies have become havens for Animal Rightists; shelters and rescues are exploited to spread propaganda, dog and cat "over-population" myths, and faulty statistics for marketing and donation receiving purposes. Shelters and Rescues naturally become a breeding ground for recruiting new uninformed members and animal rights activists. It's a natural, albeit unhealthy, fit to the animal rights adoption (for a fee) industry “chattel” agenda.

It is no wonder alleged dubious shelter operations are becoming an ever-increasing problem, importing dogs and cats to “over-populate” their agencies from out of state and foreign country animal sources. Thankfully, not all shelters/rescues are this way, but the public should be aware of what is going on.  Both Animal Control Authorities and Law enforcement who enforce animal laws and many animal shelters/rescues “have had” their ethics compromised, if not downright corrupted. The end-result is that generally, shelter/rescue workers and animal control authorities and their animal law enforcement agencies assisting them are no longer a credible source for accurate animal care and control information or about proper and constitutional animal behavior and breeding of quality pets, especially when it comes to crafting pet and animal laws.

Animal Rightist propaganda would have us believe that animal abuses and cruelty are at “epidemic” levels in the general public of pet owner’s homes and small hobby or one time family animal breeders, not to mention that dog attacks most certainly receive sensational press coverage.

The main stream media is only too happy to oblige any political opportunism by “animal rights lobbied” politicians, pro-animal control authorities, shelter/rescue agencies, and county or municipal law enforcement or government employees actively pursuing their own “Animal Rightist” agendas. Animal Rights designed animal ordinances have become a means to an end, exploited at the expense of the loving pet owners  being made into criminals without “proper and legal “due process” in animal law in our society and in the general public nationwide.

A major percentage of the nation’s animal population, dog attacks, dog fighting, and even animal cruelty and animal care and control or nuisance behavior complaints are rare when all the facts are allegedly disclosed nationwide.  As disturbing as these animal care, cruelty, and animal attack incidents are, they are not even close to being the rule... they are by far the exception. Thereby the Animal Rightists are utilizing the “exception to the rule” as an aggressive and nationwide opportunity to enact unconstitutional, intrusive, unethical, vague or illicit animal laws and animal ordinances in a horrendously distasteful and extremely dishonest manner of current and proposed animal law. 

When Animal Rightists write ordinances that “Sic” Animal Control Authorities, Animal Rightist Groups allegedly posing as Law enforcement (CA. PROP 2 laws enacting private nonprofit groups to act as law enforcement on private property) on animal owners and breeders via animal crating, care, control, licensing, pet-limits, and registration schemes in animal law, the very future of healthy well-tempered pets and animals is compromised. No breeding. No pure-bred animals. No healthy genetic stock. Hence, no more pets. No cats. No dogs. No nothing! Forever more! Except for the industry of rescue/shelter adoptions (for a fee).

The only way to prevent these unconstitutional, illegal, immoral, and illicit pet owner “confiscation and seizure” horrors from taking root in your own county and community is not to go there in the first place, in allowing these “perverted” animal laws and ordinances.  Again, only an open and active pet-friendly county and community create a fun and safe place to live with our pets and neighbors.  Animal Rightists, thru their BIG $$$ animal adoption and rescue industry (for a fee) are destroying our current animal laws in having any “common sense” or traditional, constitutional and “intrinsic value” for our pets and animals in the law governing our private property.

A disconcerting trend is sweeping America

The Disconcerting TREND…Costly and destructive animal laws and ordinances being constructed solely by the Animal Rightists with their “lobbied” legislators at all levels of government. The reason stems from an all-out effort by Animal Rightist organizations to lobby every single locale, township, county, city, and state in the U.S.A., Canada and even worldwide.  These Animal Rights Activists are searching out lawmakers to exploit and further their twisted and “perverted” agenda to destroy any authority or ability for a private property owner to legally retain and defend their pets and animals as their extended family.

It's hard to comprehend, but the leadership of the largest and most profitable "non-profit" lobbying Animal Rights organizations has an ambitious goal in mind: Destroying all usage and ownership of domestic animals. That includes, but is not limited to, abolishing pet ownership in every aspect of our society worldwide.

Animal Rightist History Recalled

Hitler and the Nazi Party used animal rights propaganda and veganism to turn neighbor against neighbor and to vilify the Jewish people and their traditions and culture. 

Dr. Martin Hulsey once a research scientist in the Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, noted "In Nazi Germany, practices such as vivisection were characterized as Jewish (by relating them to the ritual of kosher slaughter) and thereby vilified. Subsequently, reverence for the "rights" of animals was used to justify the oppression of Jewish people." The laws and accusation of vivisection were often used as a pretext to prosecute Jewish scientists. In 1940, a discussion was started within the administration about prohibiting pets, in order to conserve foodstuffs for human consumption. But personal interference by Hitler stopped this proposal. Ultimately a decree was published by the administration against pets, but it referred only to the pets in the possession of non-Aryan citizens.

On February 15, 1942, a decree was published prohibiting Jews from keeping pets, which the Jews found humiliating, writes Boria Sax in his book, Animals in the Third Reich: Pets, Scapegoats, and the Holocaust.

Merritt Clifton from Animal People News notes that Sax details the 32 'animal protection laws' adopted by Nazi Germany in only 10 years, demonstrating that many and perhaps most were really just thinly disguised cover for oppression of Jews, gypsies, and other minorities. The first two banned kosher slaughter; the last one barred Jews from keeping pets." 

Animal Rightists know full-well that they are not conservative main-stream. However, they've been successful in influencing the American lexicon with politically correct words such as "over-population,"  “puppy mill,” and “dog attacks.” With major financial support from Hollywood Animal Rightists and an ill-informed public donating money, to include the pet owners themselves, these Animal Rightists and their pro-bono activists and “spoon fed” people spread their animal law propaganda, and inaccuracies about dog behavior. Their legislative proposal packets, slides, videos, etc. are allegedly filled with phony studies, quack testimony, faulty statistics, and other materials that are sent to county, city and state councils or legislators all over the country under the guise of being a reputable source. Once again, the “lame stream” news and main stream press have been all too happy to oblige, publishing sensationalized stories which trump up the credibility of such a nonsensical agenda.

What is missing from these news stories is that these groups do not care one whit about animals, or the welfare of animals, or the health and longevity of pets and animals. This is alleged by the fact of main stream press coverage to the effect that animal rights groups such as PETA, HSUS, or other groups alleged to be saving animals publicly claim to be helping dolphins, whales, polar bears, wolves, or elephants in Africa, etc. but these same groups are allegedly and simultaneously lobbying an all-out assault to destroy any ownership or breeding of dogs, cats, and the family pet at home. This is just plain “evil.”

 

Do you know the difference between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights?

“Animal Welfare” is concerned with health, safety, quality of life, and the future of our animals.

“Animal Rights” views domestic animal ownership as "slavery" and seeks to destroy the domestic animal by whatever means necessary. The fastest and most effective way to accomplish this agenda is by using lawmakers to pass prohibitive animal laws, such as mandatory spay/neuter, or breed specific ordinances (BSL) which includes any dog or animal that even “looks like” a BSL breed whether it is or not, in actuality.

The Ends Justify the Means.  These abuses of “perverting” animal law are the sure result of the Animal Rightists campaign to wage death and destruction on our beloved dogs, pets and animals. Again, the "ends justify the means".

What exactly is the end result of these animal laws?

Power to Control We the People thru our dogs, pets, and animals. The ensuing corruption contained within the intent to “pervert” influence in the animal laws and animal ordinances aids Animal Rights Activists in the accumulation of wielding more power over the people and to establish a “war chest” of financial wealth thru the very destruction of dog, cat, and pet ownership in animal law thru fees, fines, confiscations, seizures and criminal citations. Using and exploiting lawmakers wherever they deem necessary, the Animal Rightist goal of achieving power and wealth at public animal owner expense is in full force.

Even when lawmakers pursue their own agendas, where animal ordinances are concerned, the lawmaker is still a pawn of these Animal Rightist lobbyists. Allegedly by means of having lawmakers being “bought and paid for” thru major financial contributions and donations or other “perks” to get the law makers to make animal laws, according to the agendas of the Animal Rightists.

Fighting Animal Rightist Ideology and helping County, City or State Councils to Properly Reform our “perverted” Animal Rightist Law Agendas, is The Moral of This Story:   The lesson to be learned by We the People is that by the time Animal Rightists have taken our counties, municipalities and states hostage and “their” perverted animal laws and ordinances pass, no one knows what has hit them until it is way too late to react with any authority to act.

Animal law and ordinances quickly “compromise the ethics” of Animal Control Authorities and the Law Enforcement agencies enforcing Animal Law with vague and confusing statutes and wordage in the law. These ruthless and irresponsible “perverted” animal law policies are most certainly not something that should have been introduced into animal law; let alone, considered, passed, and enforced by lawmakers and enforced by Law Enforcement. A majority of all these laws “ARE” Unconstitutional. However, it takes a major financial investment and good animal law attorney to be retained at a premium cost, to fight these “unconstitutional” animal laws, that have no “due process” and that is not something the majority of the people can afford to do. These Animal Rightist and lawmakers “know this” and bank on it.

 

If Anyone Doubts how Serious Things Have Become, Please Read the Following:

The alleged quotes by the Leaders and Activists within the Animal Rightists Movement…

• "Anybody who shoots a pit bull running loose is justified,'' Kory Nelson, Assistant City Attorney of Denver, CO, San Francisco Chronicle, Monday, June 27, 2005 (Known all over as Denver's "Dr. Death of Dogs")

• "We have no ethical obligation to preserve the different breeds of livestock produced through selective breeding. . . One generation and out. We have no problem with the extinction of domestic animals. They are creations of human selective breeding." Wayne Pacelle, Senior VP of Humane Society of the US, formerly of Friends of Animals and Fund for Animals, Animal People, May, 1993

NOTE: (Wayne Pacelle's initial training was similar to that of other PETA activists. Today he heads HSUS under the guise of "legitimacy". It is the largest and most profitable of the Animal Rightist lobbying organizations.

• "Pet ownership is an absolutely abysmal situation brought about by human manipulation." Ingrid Newkirk, national director, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Just Like Us? Harper's, August 1988, p. 50.

• "As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are like slaves, even if well-kept slaves." PETA's  Statement on Companion Animals.

• "We are not especially 'interested in' animals. Neither of us had ever been inordinately fond of dogs, cats, or horses in the way that many people are. We didn't 'love' animals." Peter Singer, Animal Liberation: A New Ethic for Our Treatment of Animals, 2nd ed. (New York Review of Books, 1990), Preface, p. ii.

• "Our goal: to convince people to rescue and adopt instead of buying or selling animals, to disavow the language and concept of animal ownership." Eliot Katz, President In Defense of Animals, In Defense of Animals website, 2001

• "It is time we demand an end to the misguided and abusive concept of animal ownership. The first step on this long, but just, road would be ending the concept of pet ownership." Elliot Katz, President "In Defense of Animals," Spring 1997

• "The cat, like the dog, must disappear... We should cut the domestic cat free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist." John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of A Changing Ethic (Washington, DC: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), 1982, p. 15.

• "My goal is the abolition of all animal agriculture." JP Goodwin, employed at the Humane Society of the US, formerly at Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade, as quoted on AR-Views, an animal rights Internet discussion group in 1996.

• "Man is the most dangerous, destructive, selfish, and unethical animal on earth." Michael W. Fox, Scientific Director and former Vice President, Humane Society of the United States, as quoted in Robert James Bidinotto"

• "We are not terrorists, but we are a threat. We are a threat both economically and philosophically. Our power is not in the right to vote but the power to stop production. We will break the law and destroy property until we win." Dr. Steven Best, speaking at International Animal Rights Gathering 2005. The Telegram (UK) July 17, 2005.

• "Arson, property destruction, burglary and theft are 'acceptable crimes' when used for the animal cause." Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA

• "Our nonviolent tactics are not as effective. We ask nicely for years and get nothing. Someone makes a threat, and it works." Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's founder and president, US News and World Report, April 8, 2002

• "I openly hope that it [hoof-and-mouth disease] comes here. It will bring economic harm only for those who profit from giving people heart attacks and giving animals a concentration camp-like existence. It would be good for animals, good for human health and good for the environment. Ingrid Newkirk, PETA founder and president, ABC News interview April 2, 2001

 

So how do “We the People” take back our Constitutional Rights in Animal Law?

ANSWER: Courage to Defend Your Private Property, and Your Animals at all costs!

"Courage is not defined by a person's ability to speak their mind, yelling like a lion's bellow at authorities and lawmakers about proposed or enacted bad animal laws. Courage is an action of humility, putting one's cause of honor, before his/her life, to retain the freedom and liberty, which We as People, seek, from an honorable and just God to defend our pets and animals, from oppressive men and women in their secret combinations of Animal Rights law making agendas." ~ Quote Authored by Dean A. Ayers, NationalDogPress ©

###

 

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

It's a terrible scam – The Animal Rights "Humane Society"

  

It's a terrible scam – The Animal Rights "Humane Society"

Animal Rights agendas using terms like, "Humane Society," are devised to “Exaggerate” every aspect of animal care and control into propaganda, so that the truth cannot be told without a lie.

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress  ©

11 Dec 09

 

Animal Rights agendas using terms like, "Humane Society," are devised with the common people in mind, who don't care to dwell on what ‘really’ happens to dogs, cats, pets and animals or their pet owners who are the true “innocent victims” of animal rights tyranny laws forced on private property owners.

Using terms like, "Humane Society," are devised to “Exaggerate “ in every aspect of animal care and control propaganda, so that the truth cannot be told without a lie. This alleged agenda to destroy “innocent” animal owner victims who own dogs, pets and animals on private property is going to escalate in society, until dog and pet owners “stand their ground” and refuse to allow their dogs, pets and animals to be illegally, or immorally confiscated with “perverted” animal laws, by defensive “force” in necessary to uphold constitutional private property law and the “right” to defend one’s life, liberty, and property.

The true “innocent victims” of this animal rights tyranny, which is forced on animal owners on private property by the HSUS, and similar animal rights activist groups perpetrating a lie from their exaggerations of the truth about dog and pet owners must become the new “battle ground” for all dog, pet, and animal owners be it owning one dog or 150 dogs, pets, or animals. Failing to get involved in “standing your ground” against tyranny in animal laws “perverted” by these animal rights activists, means an end to all life “with” our dogs, pets, and animals in our families, as “extended” members of our family unit.

Dr. Michael W. Fox, DSc, PhD, BVet Med, MRCVS is a well-known veterinarian, former vice president of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), former vice president of Humane Society International, and the author of more than 40 books on animal care and behavior, and bioethics, written allegedly according to the agendas of “Animal Rights.”

Dr. Fox is known as a sharp and eloquent critic of the biotechnology industry as a whole and of the FDA and USDA in particular. As a professor, bioethicist, and veterinarian, Dr. Fox has spearheaded the movement to foster the ethical treatment of animals (PETA), according to the agendas of the “Animal Rights Activists” since 1976. 

Michael W. Fox, former vice-president of the HSUS, said that, "to call an animal, with which you share your life a 'pet,' is reminiscent of men's magazines where you (a figure of speech, don't take it personally) have the Pet of the Month."  It is supposed that the continued use of the word "pet" to designate dogs or cats threatens to reduce their level of respect to the current status of twentieth century North American women.  ~The McGill Red Herring

PETA ad campaigns continue to roll off the press in PETA naked high profile "star" public nude and near-nude photo campaigns. It would appear that Michael W. Fox and the "Humane Society" has a blind eye (from his statement above) to their definition of "Pet of the Month."

The "Humane Society" ought to be targeting PETA Nudity Ads for the essence of hypocrisy in the "Humane Society" and PETA both representing North American women as PETA "Pets of the Month" in their own Animal Rights and nudity ad campaigns.

An "Animal Rights" activist generally has two reasons for doing a thing.  One thing, that sounds good also known as propaganda, and then the second thing, a real one, the Animal Rights alleged agenda to end pet ownership worldwide.

Exactly what benefit has the HSUS also termed "Humane Society" provided to innocent dogs, cats, and pet owners or their pets? Or has the HSUS and PETA been solely responsible to their own alleged "real" motivation of their millions in dollars of money in their pocket-books by donations and these activists are just 'sounding good' in their public statements for animal rights.

Today's Animal Rights activists have "perverted" once-sensible animal welfare goals and owner responsibilities by putting animals ahead of human beings and employing a "by any means necessary" philosophy to achieve their goals of "total animal liberation" and the destruction of pet ownership rights of the common man, woman or child.

Lead by PETA, the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), and other activist groups, the animal liberation movement does not seek to improve 'pets and animals' lives. Its goal is to place unnecessary legal restrictions on ordinary people and pet owners like you.

Today's "Humane Society" HSUS and PETA activists want to force you to eat nothing but beans and greens. They want to ban hunting, fishing, zoos, rodeos, and circuses and ultimately 'legally end with laws and ordinances' any pet ownership.

Some activists want to outlaw the use of animals in the search for cures for AIDS, Parkinson's disease, and Cancer. And a growing number of Animal Rights activists, are crossing the line from peaceful protest to violent crime. Other activists have allegedly trained animal control officers, who allegedly take the law into their own hands, by a "perverted" enforcement of animal control laws and ordinances to destroy pets thru pro-active pursuit of euthanasia and the incarceration of pet owners for questionable pet offenses around the country.

It's a terrible scam - Animal Rights. The world deserves to know the truth. History is the chronicle of divorces between creed and deed. As with history, like Noah in the Ark, it always begins with the animals. It’s time that We the People, divorce ourselves from this terrible scam of Animal Rights agenda to destroy all pet ownership on private property.

 

Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:”

Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept. Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world.

A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds:

Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979).

 

Doing Away with Dog Ownership:

All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors.

The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA, Canada, and the world, destroying the literal body of “pet ownership” freedom, by the blood sport of the Animal Rights propaganda agendas to mislead, distort, or distract from the real truth and need for pet ownership freedom. Animal Rights is the plague of the soul that has infected our society in ‘perverting’ what a good pet owner really is all about.

Animal care and control laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society's whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law, escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate."

For a person's religion is not worth its salt, if their dogs, pets and animals are not the better for it.

 ###

  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved 

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Polk County, Iowa are not logical or valid – Will You Help Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?

 

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Polk County, Iowa are not logical or valid – Will You Help Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?

Dog number limit ordinances in Polk County will lead to a decrease in pet licensing taxes by scared dog owners who are over the dog limit imposed.

 

POLK COUNTY, Iowa, 2 December 09 (NationalDogPress) --

Dogs and dog owners face more discrimination than ever before in American society, and now specifically in Polk County, Iowa for no apparent reason other than to enforce tyranny in dog “number limits” upon animal owners who appropriately take care of their dogs in their homes and on their private property in Polk County, Iowa.

Specifically, this Investigative Reporter has interviewed, Meaghan Potter-Lynch, a 19 year old, and upstanding citizen of Polk County who proudly owns and properly maintains the love, care and control of their dogs and goats at their residence in Polk County, Iowa.  Meaghan now is allegedly faced with having “all” the animals confiscated, for no other reason than for Animal Control to allegedly enforce their tyranny animal control “number limits” upon the good people of Polk County.

Meaghan stated to this Investigator, “All of my animals are up to date on shots, feed and watered properly, housed properly and loved more than anything in the world. “

It is alleged that Animal Control Authorities in Polk County, have “threatened” to confiscate “ALL” of Meaghan’s animals, when in actuality, animal control has apparently informed Meaghan that the “number limit” ordinance “allows” Meaghan to maintain three dogs on her property.  This allegedly appears to be “intimidation” by animal control, to get control of the people, thru the animal’s confiscation or alleged “threat” of total animal seizure, be told.

While local, city, county, state, and federal entities pay lip service to the dog as man’s best friend by passing tyranny dog limiting ordinances and laws, We the People as a whole community, and specifically in the community of Polk County, Iowa, have allowed fear and politics of their “Animal Control” and their “Animal Authorities” to run rampant (with citizens being unaware) by this alleged threat of tyranny animal enforcement to seize “ALL” of Meaghan’s animals on private property potentially resulting in a “total animal confiscation” of Meaghan’s “Intrinsic Valued” and beloved dogs and goats on their private property.   

This “real threat” of Animal Control Authorities allegedly “intimidating” Meaghan will determine the parameters of dog ownership based upon emotions not logic and common sense in law making for all citizens in Polk County, Iowa. 

Based upon the allegations of animal control to Meaghan and her dogs, and soon to possibly be (the same treatment) to the other citizens and residents of Polk County, Iowa, will the Polk County community “stand together” to fight off this tyranny of animal control or “fail” to get involved, -- and subsequently, each Polk County citizen, one by one, by one, will lose their animals in total, (each dog and every animal owner) in due time, in Polk County via “number limits” tyranny enforcement?  

This type of “number limit” control of the animals in Polk County, will leave their beloved dogs, pets, and animals, to be dealt with as “nothing” of value, other than being an animal having no more value than that of “chattel”.

Will the oppressor controlling all “number limits’ and animals in Polk County, Iowa become the hand of the “Mark of the Beast” in care, and control regardless of whether the citizens in Polk County, Iowa are properly maintaining their care and control of their dogs, pets, and animals on their own private property?

Time will surely tell, sooner rather than later, starting with Meaghan Potter-Lynch.

 

My question to the citizens of Polk County, Iowa who own pets and animals is:

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Polk County, Iowa are not logical or valid – Will You Help Meaghan Potter-Lynch and their Dogs Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?

We the People, spend hundreds of millions of dollars on premium foods, veterinary care, toys, kennels, pet sitters, training classes, and more even while limiting the number and type of dogs an owner can house. We use dogs to aid in catching criminals, search for victims of crimes and natural disasters, help handicapped humans, and provide emotional support even while barring dogs from communities if they exceed a certain weight, certain breed to be banned, or limits to the number of dogs allowed in a home even if they are properly cared for and loved as family.

 

The disadvantages of 'dog number' limits in homes are:

Dog owners in some communities face a limit on the number of pets they can own, but these limits, too, are counterproductive.

Laws that criminalize pet ownership based on numbers alone have been declared unconstitutional in some states because they do not address the need to control nuisances or provide for the health and safety of residents.

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, the state’s highest court, has declared such a law unconstitutional in that state, citing a precedent in Kadash v City of Williamsport:

“What is not an infringement upon public safety and is not a nuisance cannot be made one by legislative fiat and then prohibited....

“Even legitimate legislative goals cannot be pursued by means which stifle fundamental personal liberty when the goals can otherwise be more reasonably achieved.”

A dog or pet limit ordinance is difficult to enforce without increased presence of animal control or police agencies and often leads to a decrease in pet licensing to prevent cross-referencing of license records. If the law is enforced only upon complaint, it becomes just another law for people to circumvent and further erodes confidence in legislative bodies.

Numbers have no relationship to nuisances. A person with one dog that runs loose or barks all night is a greater nuisance than a person with a dozen dogs that are quiet, clean, and kept at home.

Limiting people to four dogs (or fewer) puts an unreasonable strain on people who raise show dogs, compete in performance trials, participate in canine rescue operations, foster dogs for service dog organizations, etc. and can lead to those responsible dog owners leaving the community.

A number limit causes dog deaths by forcing people to give up dogs they own, thus causing crowding in local shelters; denying people the opportunity to buy an additional dog from a shelter or a rescue; and adversely impacting rescue groups and foster homes that help find new homes for dogs whose owners cannot keep them.

Alternatives to number limits are: 

• Passage and enforcement of strict nuisance laws.
• Use of an arbitrator to mediate neighborhood disputes about animals.
• Use of alternative sentencing such as community service at the county animal shelter or attendance at a full obedience training course for those who violate nuisance ordinances.
• Periodic programs or mailings about responsible dog ownership or city sponsorship of a Canine Good Citizen test to encourage residents to be responsible dog owners. 

Animal laws are not always a result of state and federal battles. Squabbles between neighbors often erupt over animals, squabbles that often spill over into law enforcement or animal control filed complaints to local governments.  

As an emotional result the local government greases the squeaky wheel complaints by citizens with even more stricter ordinances or other tacked on to the zoning code or the criminal codes to existing animal ordinances.

Dog limit ordinances are often passed out of frustration, with little consideration for the consequences or valid and factual basis to make any “positive or constructive” benefit to the community dog complaints, other than a government official “feel good” action giving We the People even more tyranny in our local animal control ordinances.

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925


Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Dog Owner “due process” is not contained in current Animal Law – The Questions and Answers

 

Dog Owner “due process” is not contained in current Animal Law – The Questions and Answers

Due process is ‘not’ provided to dog owners in animal control ordinances before government authorities remove or euthanize their dogs from private property.

 

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress  ©

 

18 Nov 09

How Does Due Process Apply to Dog Seizure/Euthanasia Cases?

Despite the fact that animals are still considered property in all legal jurisdictions today, due process, whether rooted in the federal or state constitutions, extends to life, liberty, or property. The more complicated issue, however, is how much process is due?

The Supreme Court has promulgated a four prong test to determine this. In each situation, a court must weigh:

-the private interest affected by the official action

-the risk of an erroneous deprivation of that interest through the procedures used,

-the probable value of additional procedural safeguards, and

-the government interest involved.


Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).

Does Due process requires the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner?

Rabon v. City of Seattle (Rabon II), 107 Wash.App. 734, 743 (2001) (citing Mathews, 424 U.S. at 333). Thus, when individuals can show they will suffer irreparable harm from a post-deprivation hearing, courts has recognized that a pre-deprivation hearing is necessary. In the case of orders to euthanize pets, many courts have considered the loss to the pet owner as irreparable.


Before any court hearing can dog owners file a Petition for a Preliminary Injunction?

Dog owners should file a petition for an injunction to delay the killing of the dog until they have had the chance to be heard in court (For an actual example, see Petition for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction in the case of Wilson v. City of St. Louis (1990), which involved a Pit Bull named "Max" who was impounded and classified as dangerous because he allegedly killed the neighbor’s dog. The Circuit Court found that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the preliminary injunction was not granted and enjoined the city from killing or otherwise harming Max. The court ordered the city to release Max and change his dangerous designation to potentially dangerous.)


Is there any way of overriding a bad decision by a petition for a writ of Mandamus?

Due process includes more than just going through the motions of a hearing. In fact, even after hearings have been granted, decisions can be challenged as a prejudicial abuse of discretion that is not based on findings of fact or law. (This is what the owners of Boo, a bull mastiff who allegedly bit a child, argued in Williams v. Orange County Animal Control (1996)). In this case, owners should file a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, a judicial remedy issued by a superior court to compel a government officer to do or forbear from doing a specific act, to delay the euthanasia order until the appeal can be heard. This writ of mandamus applies in any situation in which the euthanasia should be stayed, including scenarios in which an original hearing was never given.


What are the minimum standards of Due Process for a hearing for dog owners?

It is now also clear that hearings must meet certain minimum standards. Informal reviews that animal control agencies frequently provide upon the dog owners request often do not fulfill these requirements, because the decision-maker may not be qualified to render the judgment or may not be impartial if he also made the original decision to euthanize the dog. For example, in Phillips v San Luis Obispo County Dept., 228 Cal.Rptr. 101 Cal.App. (2 Dist., 1986), the owners of Missy, a black lab known to have a bad habit of biting children, contested the city’s decision to euthanize her. The amicus brief filed by Joyce Tischler of the Animal Legal Defense Fund pointed out the Municipal Codes at issue did not provide for the Animal Regulation Directors orders to be reviewed by the Chief Sanitarian of the County Health Department or the supervising environmental health officer, the two individuals who presided over the first and second hearings.


Are there any challenges to the animal ordinance itself?

In fact, many city ordinances are flawed in that they fail to specify that owners are entitled to hearings before their pets are euthanized. These municipal codes can be challenged as unconstitutional and, even if the city already granted hearings that met minimum due process standards, the decision to euthanize the pet would still have to be overturned. Otherwise, whether dog owners generally would receive due process would be at the whim of the animal control agency, and the city could avoid having to correct its municipal codes simply by voluntarily giving all dog owners a hearing. The court of appeals in Missy's case agreed, concluding that the ordinances here are unconstitutional for failure to provide for notice and a hearing either before or after the seizure of an uncontrollable biting or vicious dog.

Most recently, in a landmark case, the court of appeals in Mansour v. King County, 128 P.3d 1241 (Wash.App. Div. 1, 2006) held that due process required even more than offering owners a hearing, ordering that an agency seeking to enforce a removal order must prove both the violation and the remedy it has imposed by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the same standard of proof imposed on the government when it attempts to temporarily remove a child from the custody of his parents. By instituting a burden of proof on the city, the court was essentially finding that the dog must be presumed innocent until the city can prove otherwise. Previously, there had been no standard of proof, and reviewing courts would only look to see if Animal Control had acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Thus, even the most minimal evidence that a dog should be removed would suffice, and owners would bear the burden of proving their pets innocent. Moreover, the court found that due process attached not only for orders to euthanize an animal, but also for orders of removal outside the county (Peter Mansour had been ordered to remove his dog from the county or turn his dog over to the city to be euthanized after his dog was accused of killing a cat).

Finally, the court held that due process required Mansour to have the ability to subpoena records and witnesses in his defense, and that the Notice and Order of Violation had to specify exactly what code provisions had been violated. Merely issuing a brief and concise description of the conditions for finding the violation is insufficient. Mansour was entitled to know ahead of time exactly what the County needed to prove at the Board hearing. If in fact it could not prove that Maxine violated a code provision that supported the removal order, he [Mansour] was entitled to know that in time to move for a dismissal at the Board level. Source Reference: Animal Legal and Historical Center.


Are there some significant problems with animal care, control, and dangerous dog laws and euthanasia execution solutions?

1. They do not reduce the number of neglect, abuse, or dog bite incidents that are legitimate in law. By focusing on the after-effects of the animal complaint of alleged neglect, abuse or a dog bite, these laws do not take any measures to prevent future neglect, abuse, animal care, pet owner control, or prevent dog bites. In theory, the risk of animal care and control ordinance punishment is for a motivation to change behavior. But most dog owners do not believe their dogs to be dangerous or the owners to be abusive or neglectful. So the perception is that these animal care and control laws are for 'other' dogs, problem dogs, but not their dog. Then, when a dog complaint, incident or dog bite allegedly occurs, that particular dog owner may face additional liability, but his/her friends and neighbors will not change their habits regarding their own dogs. These animal care and control laws 'do not' work as a viable solution.

2. The animal laws do not take into account the severity of the incident. Most animal care, control and dangerous dog laws cover a huge range of behavior from "threatening displays" to actual bites to simple care, and control of the dog(s). What this means is that you may be as liable for your goofy social dog rushing out the door and charging gleefully at a neighbor as another owner is for an under socialized, aggressive dog who bites a child on the face. Are these equal? Under many dangerous dog laws, they are. Additionally, animal care and control laws are intentionally 'vague' and 'interpretive' by animal control authorities. Thus the facts of alleged animal care and control, is rarely 'pure' and never 'simple.' And may not even be factually the 'truth' except by a personal (opinion) 'interpretation' of the animal control authority.


What does a lack of “due process” for dog owners come down to?

Dangerous dog laws, and animal care and control laws are a feel-good attempt to show the community that that authorities are taking action, even with a simple animal care or control complaint or a dog bite incident.

Unfortunately these animal laws do not provide any protective effects to change animal - owner behavior, merely punishment after the fact. There are many things that a community can do to prevent dog bites, animal neglect, animal abuse, or other care and control issues, including educating dog owners, parents, rural families or farmers, and citizens how to supervise and when to intervene in kid-and-dog, or dog-and-dog, interactions, teaching dog owners how to socialize and train their dogs with methods that encourage friendly behavior and providing some basic animal education about canine body language so the many misunderstandings we have with dogs each day can be reduced in their care and control issues.


Dog owners need to learn how to defend their dogs from ‘rogue’ Animal Control Authorities before they are confiscated, seized, and euthanized before you (as the dog owner) can obtain Legal Counsel.

 

 

More questions and answers we need to ask about “Due Process”.

 

DUE PROCESS is what is missing from the ordinance of animal laws, which are in force in most jurisdictions today.

 

1. IF YOU ARE FACED WITH CONFISCATION OR EUTHANASIA ISSUES CURRENTLY OR BEFORE. 

 

 It is necessary that you seek counsel from an attorney BEFORE you allow any authority to confiscate your dogs, pets, or animals, and ask the attorney to intervene with authorities to stop the process, based on a review of their animal laws being used, that DO NOT contain DUE PROCESS for the pet owners according to law case precedent established in this article and case law. In this way it is very likely the confiscation can be stopped or overturned, based on an unconstitutional law.

 

2. HOW TO ESTABLISH "DUE PROCESS" WHEN NOT IN A PRESENT DOG CONFISCATION CASE.

 

It is necessary to make enough flack or waves, thru getting the word out to your local animal control legislators for the jurisdiction you are in, to make them see the light, that current animal control laws and ordinances are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, as they DO NOT contain the lawful DUE PROCESS established by these case precedents in this article containing the case law establishing the requirements for DUE PROCESS before confiscation or euthanasia. It will take aggressive campaigning and raising the flag to the locals to get a campaign going for animal control law reform in your local town, county, and state. But this needs to be done, to change the law to protect the pet owners from the current level of tyranny without law controls on THEM.

 

3. MOST NEEDED, BUT COSTLY TO THE POCKET BOOK.

 

The fastest and most public attention gathering method to change the animal laws to include the DUE PROCESS in this article is to have an attorney file a lawsuit against the jurisdiction, CHALLENGING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY of the animal law currently in force. When you establish thru evidence of the LACK OF DUE PROCESS IN THEIR ANIMAL LAWS, in court in a law suit, the Judge will have no alternative but to OVERTURN the current animal law, and it will be thrown out (the law will be) like the dish water for being Unconstitutional and vague. Thus the animal law is nullified, and no longer in force, at that moment, and the legislators will have to START OVER in creating a new animal law, that INCLUDES the ruling of a need for Constitutional DUE PROCESS included in the local animal law.

 

4. It is not as simple as just telling an animal control authority, that there is no Due Process.

 

Animal Control like cops will do ANYTHING they DAMN WELL PLEASED to you, UNTIL, and UNLESS, you OBTAIN AN ATTORNEY, to establish legal precedents to stop them. It ALWAYS comes down to working thru an attorney, BEFORE the pets or animals are confiscated or euthanized.  The word needs to spread, that people, need to have A PLAN OF ACTION, and ATTORNEY AT HAND, BEFORE they are ever faced with Animal Control, in order to stop them from tyranny. If Animal Control, knocks on your door, and you refuse them entry. You have only the amount of time, it takes for them to obtain a search and seizure warrant from a judge, and their time to come back to you, in order for YOU TO GET AN ATTORNEY AND START THIS NEGOTIATION PROCESS OF DUE PROCESS, if your animal laws do NOT contain the Proper Due Process in the current Animal Laws (which almost every Animal Law in the nation does NOT have).

 

5. This is what must be done, by every citizen with a pet, to get DUE PROCESS in their jurisdiction.

 

First off, GET AN ATTORNEY, to represent you, in each case listed above. Preferably an Attorney at Law WITH some experience in Animal Law.

###

 

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Animal laws and officers enforce nincompoop "dweeb" tyranny

 

Animal laws and officers enforce nincompoop "dweeb" tyranny 

Animal laws that limit the number of animals allowed in a household or vaguely define a “bad smell” in the pet owner’s home are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals.

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

14 Nov 09

 

Many dog owners in recent years have faced the unthinkable; a knock at their door that has heralded the arrival of an Animal Control officer with a complaint about your dog(s). In some cases that visit has been concluded satisfactorily to both the dog owner and the animal control officer; in others it has meant the heartache of either seizure of the owner’s dog(s) and/or facing stiff fines for various reasons in an abuse, neglect, or number limit citation.

With animal ownership laws now undergoing radical evolving changes throughout the country, the result is now a ‘perverted’ evolving animal “activist” produced animal care and control law now being used. Animal rights ‘extremists' some of which are in fact, animal control officers, and others working in animal  rights group legislation lobbies are the new means for dog owner 'harassment.' The constant upgrade of these radical ‘animal controlling’ laws drastically increases the ‘real’ possibility of a visit to your door on your own private property from Animal Control Authorities becoming ever more of a specter to haunt you and also every dog owner in the nation.

Specifically targeted by legislation ‘activists’ are creating the laws that 'limit' the number of dogs, cats, pets, and animals allowed in a household (by an unsubstantiated arbitrary pet ‘limit’ number) which is intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals who are thought to have "too many," according to this arbitrary standard put into the animal law.  Even more sinister is that these ‘activist’ pushed animal laws are also applied even to those people who are not in violation of health, nuisance and humane laws.

These dog or animal "number limit" laws are now being joined by various other anti-pet ownership restrictive laws, such as mandatory breeder permits and licensing requirements (being pursued for example at this time in Iowa legislation) for even a single one time litter of any dog and the owner is now faced with major state intrusive inspections for a kennel or breeder license for having more than 3 pets in the home, or having a single litter of puppies. All of this being “PAINTED” as the need to stop alleged puppy mills, which of course in most instances is “bull”. Other totally vague animal control laws that can threaten responsible dog owners who are not in any kind of notable breeding or kenneling business are those ‘activist’ lobbied animal laws that allow the animal control officer to ‘define’ the offense of “BAD SMELL” in the home as a violation in animal control care and control laws.  Many good and loving pet owners whose dogs are well cared for and kept as their extended family members are suddenly in violation of an animal control officers “definition of “BAD SMELL” in the home, based upon the pets living in their homes, rather than caged outside alone and exposed to the climate, like a beast.

Why, there are many people, who object to a ‘single turd’ in a field that can be smelled downwind from 3 miles away, and object to that smell as a “BAD SMELL” under animal law or other people who are obsessed, compelled or driven to use massive amounts of dangerous cleaning products (by the liter or gallon) in a home (that are dangerous to the health of the animals and humans alike)to kill any and all ‘bad’ smells; so take into account an ‘activist’ animal control officer, who is this described ‘clean freak’ inspecting pet owner homes, using this vague and intrusive animal law as a criminal, abusive, or neglectful animal law violation according to their ‘definition of a ‘BAD SMELL’ in the pet owners home.

This vague and intrusive ‘unbalanced’ definition of tyranny control in the animal law begs for fees, fines, confiscations, seizures, and ultimate adoption or euthanasia of properly maintained pet owner animals in their home. Tyranny at its core to allow an ‘activist’ animal control officer to ‘harass’ and ‘intimidate’ virtually any pet owner in their jurisdiction, based solely upon a “BAD SMELL?” Please! These ‘activist’ animal laws have completely gone over the edge of the cliff in dealing in ‘reality’ and ‘common sense’.

'Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom' National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) is actively opposing all restrictive legislation limiting the responsible pet ownership of all dogs, cats, and other pets. Unfortunately some 'perverted' anti-pet ownership laws have still made their way onto the books. Just take a look at the 94 + page anti-pet ordinance of Louisville, KY by its Metro council, or the tyranny animal control laws with a three strike violation rule, taking away any right to owning any pet or animal in Omaha, Nebraska, or the 3-strike violation rule in Mills County, Iowa if your little 'fluffy' is caught off your private property 3 times. Your little "Fluffy" will be declared a "dangerous dog" according to their animal care and control ordinance for the county. How’s that for success in animal control laws stopping animal crimes in the midst of a rural county? These ‘activist’ based and promoted animal tyranny laws are occurring all across the nation as we speak. Ever more intrusive and controlling by the day.

For all dog owners, do we need reminded that it is important to promote the need for responsible freedom in the care and ownership of your dog(s) and pets in order to prevent tyranny from overcoming common sense in dog ownership matters? Or is it going to take a ‘knock at your door’ and an unlawful dog confiscation without any ‘due process’ for the dog owner to open your eyes to the truth in animal law "tyranny" now days?

 

Breeding even a single dog litter is now the ‘target’ of license laws

There is great value to society in the historic preservation of all our pet ownership of our chosen dog breeds as extended members of our family, and in the selective, planned breeding of our pets, for desirable and predictable traits in our chosen and favored dog breeds as well.

Claims that the organized dog fancy or local backyard hobby dog breeders contributes to the problem of homeless dogs in shelters cannot be supported by any alleged evidence from any Animal Rights activist groups, such as PETA, ELF, ALF, HSUS, ASPCA or any local humane society through facts that are real, not manufactured like liberal propaganda.

Above all else, dog owners, backyard dog hobbyists and dog fanciers must all become aware of the animal control laws in their own locale, and must also be aware of their 'rights' if faced with that ‘intrusive’ visit from an Animal Control Officer or Law Enforcement Officer regarding your pets and animals, and their ability to ‘harass’ you with vague and ‘interpretive’ definitions of the animal laws.

It is necessary for all dog and pet owners  to be familiar with all animal identification regulations for your dogs in your locale, as the future to continued further 'restrictive' local, county, state, or federal animal care, control, or identification regulations are potentially, only a 'stroke of the pen' away from being amended to include identification of many non-farm related pets and animals to be further controlled and cared for by government laws, due to any potential future transmission of a communicable animal disease in dogs or other pets or animals that may arise.

At that time, you and your dogs, and animals will then have to deal with Federal, State, and local animal control regulations on your private property, called a premises. Not only will you have a real possibility of 'animal control' showing up with restrictive regulations and ordinances of your dogs and your ownership freedom, but you will also have to deal with the 'dog-ma' of inspector police from the USDA animal and agriculture authorities or your state controlled 'dog-cops' checking your animals on your private property premises as well.

ALWAYS, Always, always, educate yourself and learn your animal control laws for your area and 'stand your ground' in knowing your 'rights' in responsible dog ownership. Always insure you have a name, and contact number for an Attorney at Law that is familiar with ‘Animal Law” in order to represent you and your dogs, not if, but when, the ‘activists’ in animal control come knocking at your door.

Remember when it comes to freely owning your dogs, pets and animals in an area frequented by Animal Rights Activists or Animal Control, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

NationalDogPress ©

  

 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW: 

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

NationalDogPress ©, Lead Investigative Reporter - Dean A. Ayers

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles and postings at the following links. Then be sure to come back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.


http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress©, and DogPress.org news press services.

EMAIL: Dogpressorg@aol.com

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government; Dog Licensing Is An Outrage

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government by Dean A. Ayers        The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA Today. We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals. Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions: Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking. A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USA the licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal. Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:” Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept. Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world. A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds: Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979). Doing Away with Dog Ownership: All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto, and those of us who have traditionally grown our own food or owned animals personally for various reasons will be locked out or the owners will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc. Read the rest of the article Copyright © 2009 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc.

Pets Owner Rights and Freedoms; No matter what YOU say

Pets Owner Rights and Freedoms

No matter what YOU say 

By Dean A. Ayers

NationalDogPress ©

 7 Nov 09

 

PEACE will come when people live
In friendship, side by side,
And cherish understanding
More than hatred, greed and pride.

PEACE will come when people see
All people as the same,
And no one has to live in fear,
In ignorance, or in shame.

PEACE will come when people care
Who are needing can reach out
For shelter, food, pets and love,
And no has to do without.

PEACE will come when people act
And learn to listen and to care
About the rights and dignity
Of common people everywhere.

Yesterday, the greatest question was decided

 Which ever was debated in America.

 

 And a greater perhaps never was,

 Nor will be, decided among men.

 

 A resolution was passed without one dissenting colony,

 That those United Colonies are,

 And of right ought to be,

 Free and Independent States.

 

Now you ask, so how does this affect me?

 

Wake up soon, my good people

And you will see

 

"RFID" Chips for injected for thee

You will cease you to be free

No more Liberty,

No dog or pet walks, horse rides

Cow tipping, stable pet pride

Without reporting all your movements,

Locations, whereabouts, or vet checks

Off your premises or it’s your hide.

 

Pet ID Tags, Dog ID Tags, Cat ID Tags 
For your loving dogs and pets.

Dog tags, cattle tags, hog tags, goat tags, horse tags,

Boar tags, exotic tags, rabbit tags, lamb tags,

Head tags, hand tags, ear tags,

RFID chip tags for all animals and for thee

 

All required by the

USDA and Animal Rights Veterinarian

You have to get.

 

Now do you think you will still be Free?

FEES!

FINES!

CONFISCATIONS!

Until your Pet and Animal Dies!

Fail to report your movements

And you are a criminal by Animal Rights regulations

Keep you in check.

 

Well I will Fight the Animal Rights legislation tyranny

The USDA too won't get past

I knowingly believe my Dogs, Pets, and Animals do have souls

I am their Protector

Which by my Fight for them always be with Honor, I will uphold!

 

By "On HIGH" I AM inspired

To "Honor" Jesus Christ’s teachings,

Not mans Animal Law “perverted” folly, in your wake.

 

I will defend my Rights and Freedoms

No matter what YOU say.

God given Constitutional Rights, are at stake.

 

My Animals have eternal souls of Life

There fore I am "duty" bound to stay in the fight.

Animal Rights and their “perverted” laws

 will not take away my pets and animals

Their souls and mine will still be defended now.

By my “Oath” to defend my dogs, pets, and animals

“Standing my ground” in freedom

 With Christ’s word and Oath, we have taken.

His blood and spit upon our hands and feet

He for us, and us for him, we share an “Oath” with him,

Our dogs, pets, animals and liberty be free

defended by We the People,

 In God we trust

Even unto our death if it must be, to remain free.

 

Now we fight just to give some safe food

To our dogs, pets and animals to eat

Always in fear of an unknown poison from China

Or H1N1 Flu animal diseases of the animals so meek.

 

No Animal Rights legislation or common sense regulations

 To protect our pet’s food,

Or FDA concern to be poison free.

Never mind some pet food companies say,

They are only pets

Easily replaced so they portray,

 By unknown pet food testing Veternarians.

 

     When a beloved pet dies, the pet goes to  a special place.

There is always food and water and warm spring weather.
    The old and frail animals are young again. 

 Those who are maimed are made whole again. 

 They play all day with each other.
    There is only one thing missing. 

 They are not with their special person

who loved them on earth.

    So, each day they run and play until the day comes

 When one suddenly stops playing and looks up!

The nose twitches! The ears are up! The eyes are staring!

 And this one suddenly runs from the group.

    You have been seen,

And when you and your special friend meet,

 You take him or her in your arms and embrace. 

 Your face is kissed again and again and again,

And you look once more into the eyes of your trusting pet.

    Then you cross the Veil into Eternal Life together,

 never to be separated again.

 

I believe I am Fighting for Our Lives with Our Animals

The Legislation Bridge now is over troubled waters

Freedom’s Red, White, and Blue colors are now changing

To Blood red flows

Freedom's death march now comes chasing

 

Animal Rights Laws and Animal Rights Legislation Poisons are Flowing ever closer

To the Veiled Bridge of Life

Connecting Heaven and Earth.

 

Freedom's gate We the People call in

To keep our dogs, pets and animals closer.

 

Your Liberty and Freedom

The USDA, FDA, and Animal Rights will they take

If you don't get a grip

And let reality Awake.

 

Fight the Animal Laws of poison and Pet Food Poison scams.

Again I say

You don't believe in what I say?

So be it

I do, I prayed!

For all our dogs, pets, animal food they eat.

"On HIGH" inspired by the

Agro-terrorism attacks that in Islamic law, they do create.

Beginning at Fort Hood, Texas

A Beast as a Major concerned with freedom’s poison,

To murder in pure hate, our freedom and it’s gate.

 

To Stop the poison and diseased oppressor's We must Fight

Before the Veiled Life Bridge begins to collapse this very night.

 

"Pet Animal Demolition" is our fight now, I say

For our Dogs, pets, and animals welfare and our own lives

You had better pray.

 

Now you ask, so how does this affect me?

So I say.

 

Wake up soon, my good people

And you will see.

 

Whether you believe in "me" or not

In what and how, I now write and "I say!"

 

Wake up and Fight for Freedom People,

Or you will be RFID "Chipped"

As will your Dogs, Pets and Animals.

And “your” Freedom will All

Be "Chipped" away!

 

By Animal Rights Laws “de facto” in their regulations,

Or just plain killed by their simple Chinese tainted pet food

That once was found in every home and way.

 

This is not a coincidence, isolated and gone astray.

 

It’s soon to be known as the

“MARK OF THE BEAST”

“EVIL” in Your Own Back Yard.

One Fine Day!

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Aren't "We, the People" with Dogs, Pets, and Animals the Government?

Aren't "We, the People" with Dogs, Pets, and Animals the Government?

Whatever happened to 'We the People' to take care of all our dogs, pets and animals, let alone all our people in this nation?

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress ©

31 Oct 09

We the people...

The traditional American story is the story of ‘We the People’.

As Americans, the most important part of our social identity is our role as citizens. To be a citizen means to be part of, and a defender of, the commons of our nation. The water we drink, the air we breathe, the streets we drive on, the schools that we use, the departments that protect us, even animal control authorities to protect pets and animals from abuse, and neglect -- these are all the physical commons. And there are also the cultural commons -- the stories we tell ourselves, our histories, our religions, and our nation’s values that describe our “intrinsic value” of ourselves. And there are the commons of our power systems (in the majority of American communities) which is our electronic and gas commons, and the commons of 'fair and balanced' investigative reporting of our radio, TV, and print news spectrum allegedly to keep the corrupt politics in check, along with insuring the free speech and publishing by all citizens of the world and our nation, in print, on TV, radio, or on the Internet. Most important for the citizenship is the commons of government -- the creation and the servant of ‘We the People’. At least that was how it “WAS” supposed to be, before “tyranny” in government come along for the ride.

Franklin D. Roosevelt understood this commons. In his "Four Freedoms" speech, he said, "Necessitous men are not free men." Hungry people aren't free people, no matter what you want to call them. Hungry people can't be good citizens: they're too busy taking care of the hungry part of themselves to care about the citizen part. That is what "we the people" should be, but today it is not that; the commons. This nation is no longer a constitutional based free society common, let alone any common at all, except for the common good of the “corrupt” and “elite” which are turning this great nation into a banana republic under the combined “evil” forces of Socialism, Communism, and Fascism.

Republicans and Democrats as a party direction, are all alike, and are all allegedly corrupt and self-serving to the socialistic commons and one world order goal to be governed by a one world government and religion, under the United Nations. We the People are now bound to the corporate government goals that want to fund FDR's social safety net (now to be called Barrack OBAMA's social safety net).  Because these “obsessive controlling” politicians over the people are directed and motivated to fundamentally not believe in the concept of constitutional freedom of 'We the People' in collectively protecting all of us in anything other than a military/police “martial law” style way, using “scare tactics” called tyranny. FDR and the new 2009 OBAMA “blind” backers don't believe that "the unintelligent rabble" should run the country. They want big corporations to run the commons of our nation and to be inter-mixed into our government itself which is called socialism. Leading to Communism, and ultimately Fascism. 

The Republicans and the Democrats are now, no longer two separate free thinking parties, but one party playing a 'dog and pony' show to deceive 'We the People' in thinking the citizens actually have a choice for freedom in elections and decisions of the commons. This new one party system (in actuality), a 'dog and pony' show' common political party thinks that the most appropriate role for citizens is that of infantilized welfare of consumers -- only here to serve the government in paying their demanded taxes, fees, fines, confiscations, and ultimately 'slave labor' of both commercial products and commercially produced political packaging of our constitution and laws effecting everything from our pets and animals, to all the nations people, ultimately to all our common good -- the commons.

This is the new fundamental debate in our society: Are we a nation of citizens who cherish our pets, animals, and constitutional freedom to exist on private property or a nation of begging “welfare” Obama-nation consumers? Are we a democracy run by freedom seeking citizens, or are we a “welfare state” that holds consumers locked in dependency by virtue of their “free handout seeking” consumption and need to be infantile and controlled like a “helpless child” by government apathy, trickery, fraud deceit, and ultimately a one world order style government under the world's United Nations?

Petty “welfare” consumerism appeals to the greedy and selfish child part of us, the infantilized part that just wants someone else to take care of us. The core message of most commercials is that "you are the most important person in the world." Commercial advertising almost never mentions "we" or "us."

What is at stake today is the very future of our U.S. Constitution and our democratic republic founded in freedom “without” federal controlling our every move or breath in life or death.  If we accept an identity as fearful, infantilized “welfare” handout seeking Obama-nation consumers in always accepting the “perverted” laws against our pets and animals, and then subsequently we the people in bastardized laws destroying our original U.S. Constitution, we will be acting from our baby part of our brains and allowing corporate - government “owned” America and an increasingly tyranny of an authoritarian “people control” tyranny government to fill the role of a parent part in every aspect of our lives in America. A “Mark of the Beast” that effects people, not just the animals in society, as to whether they live, eat, breath, or even die (by euthanasia or starvation), by the government’s hand and their perceived power of their forehead.

The story we are told is that we should surrender all of our power to the new “owned” government - corporations of health care, animal control, food supply control, farm control, small business control, taxation control, and swine flu vaccination control, etc. etc. etc.  And just let them govern us because a mystical but all-knowing godlike force called "OBAMA –NATION” dictated the end to all free markets of the new FDR" will eventually solve all of our problems. We the People are told that “we” will be “taken care of”. Well isn’t that what Animal Control Authorities tell the “captured” pets and animals, when they are driven, cages, and ultimately “euthanized” in the name of their “own good”? A deception with life altering and life ending results to dogs, cats, and pets, and now to “We the People”.

Truth in this common definition of ‘We the People’, fits in very well with all the liberals, progressives,  and the moderate conservatives (now a one party 'dog and pony show' ideology system) which is now the other story: that we are children (like chickens)  who need to be protected from evil by humans such as animal rights, animal eating, animal husbandry, animal laws, animal ordinances, NAIS, animal identification for disease identification, etc.; and because government owned corporations and government politicians (now combined as one entity) are now “amoral” and not humane, they are self proclaiming that they (the elites) are intrinsically and morally superior to evil “common” humans called citizens or in other words not politically correct, called 'We the People'. The Animals, with arms and legs, not just paws.

To save freedom in democracy “We the People” thru an independent THIRD PARTY (yet to be discovered) must crack that religious code of destiny of the coming “Mark of the Beast” scenario that we as people are headed for in our own lifetime and bring back the original U.S. Constitutional and spirit and action of the 'Declaration of Independence' code.  A Declaration of Independence so well understood by our Founders of this nation: that we “were” a country of barn-builders, of self sustaining “honest” communities, of intrinsically good people who work together for the common good and the common wealth in freedom on “private property”, and in the freedom to freely own and raise our pets and animals without the “perverted” animal laws of “tyranny”,  under “perverted” oppressive  socialism by the corporate - government promoting the propaganda of a “welfare seeking” consuming freebee “corrupt” non-producing “Banana Republic” Obama-nation tradition. ‘We the People’ begin this process by speaking to the responsible part of us, the part that enjoys being grown up and socially independent and fiscally responsible. And also preparing to 'stand your ground' when tyranny comes knocking on your own door, not just to “steal” away your pets, animals and private property, but to “steal” your self esteem to exist with “freedom” as the law of the land. We the People need to prepare to survive without the help of corporate - government Obama-Nation intervention in our lives. Because very shortly, one fine day, the corporate – government “National Police” state is going to collapse, and then reform into the one world order, under the United Nations economy, and destined to be a One World Order, "Mark of the Beast." One that not even Obama (the alleged self proclaimed savior of the world) can even control.

The “true” story we have to tell is the story of citizenship derived from our best and most noble parts. It's the story of “We the People” sadly now disappearing along with the common freedom and liberty being stolen from each and every citizen by starting with “perverted” animal control and people controlling laws and their “perverting” common sense “out of” animal law and legislation daily as we speak.

We the People talk a lot about the features of citizenship, like the right to vote but when the corporate – government owned nation of business and law making, makes it so expensive to even be a candidate, let alone the media destroying fine new people like 'Joe the plumber' or Sarah Palin as new candidates, then there is no right to vote, but we sometimes forget what the benefits of a truly free society really were. It seems now days, the people just want to be “taken care of” in all aspects of their life, taking no responsibility for them to survive. A “welfare” state of affairs. So Sad!

The main benefit of citizenship is freedom -- not freedom from external or internal dangers (although that is included in the package, it's only one of the six purposes listed in the Preamble to the Constitution), but freedom to think as we want, to pray as we want, to say what we want, and to live as we want to fulfill our true potential as humans (the other five things listed in the Preamble) which are centered around the ultimate protection of our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness on our own “private property.” Private property which We as People need to protect from the government “tyranny” of unconstitutional enforced government authority intrusion on “We the People” and our private property, which include our pets, and the animals.  We as People need to once again “learn” what a blessing it is to “just be free”!  We no longer have that concept in mind – sadly!

The question, ultimately, is whether our nation will continue to stand for the values on which it was founded, or will “We the People” be 'marked' like we now are marking our beasts. It's all about the Spirit of God or the Devil to control us through our 'commons'. Like it or not. 

President Thomas Jefferson, who beat Adams in the "Revolution of 1800" election, rebuked those who wanted America ruled by an iron-handed presidency that could -- as Adams had -- throw people in jail for "crimes" such as speaking political opinion, and without constitutional due process.

"I know, indeed," that some honest men and women fear that a free and constitutional common government cannot be strong any longer with the onslaught of the OBAMA style FDR socialism, apathy and desire for a welfare government - corporation system to provide all consumer goods; that this government is not strong enough." But, Jefferson in 1800 said our nation was "the world's best hope" precisely because we put our trust in We the People.

Until We the People, trust again in God's laws and that of the U.S. Constitution in its original form (with a Bill of Rights), to keep corporations out of government power, and to limit the legislation making powers and out of control citizen, animal and life altering taxing and tyranny out of control spending of the government, We the People, ARE NOT the government. We the People, in their eyes, are the “enemy” of their corporate - government.

God help us all. Or “Stand Your Ground” and make a difference! It’s Your Choice or your loss. DECIDE NOW! Before it is really too late! Remember it all starts with controlling your pets and animals, then it escalates to We the People in society. Remember that!

###

 

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved