Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc. (Non-Profit)

NationalDogPress © Articles - "Scroll Down" - Below This Cover Page. ~~ Please "Donate" to Support Dogs, Pets, and their Owner Rights!

  

NationalDogPress © Articles "Scroll Down" Below This Cover Page.

Please "Scroll Down" to "Read" All Our News Articles!

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit) Owns The National Dog Press

 

 
 

ANIMALS C.L.U.B.- FREEDOM National Organization Incorporated (Nonprofit)


A "Nonprofit" National C.L.U.B. and Animal Protection Organization to Protect Pet Owners.


Welcome to our National Organization known as Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom.

We the People, of this National "Nonprofit" Organization, want to express our appreciation to you for taking an "active"interest in preserving "your" rights to freely own your "pets"and "animals" without intrusion by the government, individuals, or "animal rights activist" groups or other organizations, who’s sole mission are to "eliminate" and "destroy" our freedom, liberty, and American way of life, with our pets and animals on our own private property as extended members of our families.

Laws are only words written on paper, words that change on society’s whim, and are interpreted differently daily by politicians, lawyers, judges, and policemen. We cannot by total reliance on law; escape our "duty" to judge right and wrong, and take "action" to stop the tyranny at "Freedom's Gate." For a person's religion is not worth it’s salt, if the animals and pets are not the better for it.

Dean A. Ayers, (Prior) Special Agent, AFOSI, U.S.A.F., United States of America.

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/

Please visit daily our National Organization's Official Article Publishers at the links below, with over 50 total articles on Dog Law, Pet Owners, Animal Welfare, Dogs, Pets, and Animal Articles affecting every Pet Owner in the USA and Canada. 

Just CLICK on the 3 links below for separate articles numbering in excess of 50 articles to date in total.

Visit our many nationally published pet and animal articles and postings at the following links. 

Then be sure to come back and read the rest of this web site's pages and articles as well.


http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/members/16235/Dean%20A.%20Ayers/

and

http://www.associatedcontent.com/user/583274/dean_a_ayers.html

and

http://www.AnimalsClubFreedom.typepad.com/

Posted by http://DogPress.org/ at 1:06 PM     

Labels: Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom, NationalDogPress

Posted in NationalDogPress

Tagged as national dog press, nationaldogpress, and animals c.l.u.b.- freedom | dogpress.org

PETA Cross in Ad with naked Angel on agenda for Animal Rights porn ads

NationalDogPress ©

by Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc. (Nonprofit)

PETA cross with naked Angel on agenda with that of Animal Rights porn ads offending Catholics and others

5 Dec 09 11:55 pm (NationalDogPress) --

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) Cough, Cough, Ya Right--, has now allegedly "perverted" the image of angels according to sources in the Catholic church and other God fearing people, by turning angels into porn ads for PETA propaganda.

After a season of high-stepping on Dancing With The Stars, Playboy model Joanna Krupa has stripped nude with a religious cross over her crotch, among other sex parts, called boobs, in an effort to make animal rights lovers to think twice before buying a pup from any breeder. Rather PETA nude ads are pushing the profitable business of dog rescue for a "fee," also known as adoption (for a fee).

Unfortunately for the Polish-born blonde, The Catholic Church isn't as gung-ho about animals as she is. Some church officials are beside themselves with fury that Joanna is showing her privates under the guise of a Heavenly Angel.

Joanna Krupa, who bared all for the December issue of Playboy, appears as a winged angel, covered by a carefully placed crucifix, in a saucy new billboard in conjunction with animal rights group People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). The stunner — who own four pooches of her own — unveiled the poster outside a Barkworks Store in Los Angeles on Tuesday.

“It’s totally inappropriate,” Said Deal Hudson, publisher of InsideCatholic.com, an online magazine. “It’s another instance of disrespect toward Christianity and another example of the kind of abuse that would never occur with any other major religion, because the outcry would be so immediate and so loud that the people behind it would immediately retreat.”

Nonetheless, Joanna Krupa stands by her naked PETA poster: “We're trying to spread the word that breeding isn't the way to go. Somebody needs to put their foot down and stop this breeding and these puppy mills… It makes me so angry that our government doesn't do anything about it. So I am!”

Unfortunately, no one with "common sense" and facts, bothered to explain to Nude Joanna Krupa, that Animal Rights and their agendas want to wipe out all dog breeding competition.  The animal rescues can then make "all the profits" in dog adoptions for "fees" with this agenda of their new "in thing" for PETA and other animal rights groups.

Too Bad -- Krupa got all Naked on a cross for nothing. Except for a free "pass" to HELL! God willing!

Source:  Pop crunch

- Return to web site -

© NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009,

© NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

An Open Letter to Mills County, Iowa Animal Control Authorities

 

An Open Letter to Mills County, Iowa Animal Control Authorities

Do I have to pay animal taxes on my "not" raised dogs with your office in Mills County, Iowa according to your new animal care and control county tyranny laws?

5 Dec 09

- SATIRE-

By Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress © 

Dear Mills County, Iowa Sires and Animal Care and Control Authorities,

My friend over at Well Fare, Iowa just received two subsidy checks for $1,000 each from their county government office of animal care and control run by the State of Iowa Animal Rights Activist Legislation Employment Office, for "not" raising dogs in Iowa counties. 

Right now I'm not getting any extra help from the government while I'm displaced from my previous employment because of the failing economy, so I want to go into the "not-raising-dogs" business, sponsored by State of Iowa and Mills County, Iowa Animal Rights Activist Legislation Employment Office, which I heard was sponsored by the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) created by the USDA. I heard allegedly that these new animal care and control laws you now have are now approved by Mills County, Iowa, Board of Supervisors, on 1 March 2009, in order to promote tyranny in animal care and control of law abiding dog and pet owners in your Iowa County. All of this animal control, of course, for the purpose of totally “taxing” dog and animal owners to “death” in the county, or face confiscation of their animals by the county animal controlling authorities. 

So in the spirit of following your new animal ‘taxation’ laws in Mills County, Iowa; what I want to know is, in your opinion, what is the best kind of dog home or animal farm "not" to raise dogs in, and what is the best breed of dogs "not" to raise in Mills County, Iowa? 

Do I have to register or license my "not" raised dogs with the new National Animal Identification System (NAIS) of the USDA, or with the Mills County, Iowa ARF Animal Control office? Also can I "not" report all the dogs that I will “not” own, every 24 hours as required by the NAIS regulations, when I do “not” move them off premises, so I will "not" be fined $1,000 a day, per "not" dog or animal, per "not" violating the regulations, according to the USDA NAIS and Mills County, Iowa anti-dog care and control regulations "not?" 

I want to be sure that I approach this endeavor of “not” raising any dogs with my family in Mills County, Iowa in keeping with all the USDA and Mills County, Iowa alleged governmental/corporation "taxation without representation" funded laws and policies that your animal care and control laws allegedly promote. I would prefer “not” to raise purebred, cross-breed, mixed dogs, or any rescued dogs, but if that is not a good type or breed "not" to raise as a family dog, then I will just as gladly "not" raise any AKC registered breed of dogs on my private property either, in Mills County, Iowa. 

As I see it, the hardest part of this USDA and Mills County, Iowa “animal taxation” and tyranny animal care and control legislation program will be in keeping an accurate inventory of how many dogs I have "not" raised.

That being said, in the "not" raising dogs for "unincorporated county area families" animal care and control brochures (not), for small dog non-producers, which I will qualify for; that this regulation and animal license and taxation program is “not” voluntary, even if my dogs are permanent indoor house dogs.

I need to know that as long as I "not" let the "not" raised family dogs off my private property, called "not" a dog owner premises," then I understand you will "not" subject my family to tyranny controlled ‘taxation’ and “harassment” on my private property about my “not” owned dogs under the Mills County, Iowa animal care and control animal taxation control legislation program that is now mandatory.

Can you please tell me if I got the Mills County, Iowa dog taxation facts correct from the new animal care and control laws you approved, Sire? I understand you all are "not" very responsive to citizens questions about this new animal care and control law, but that you all think you already have "all" the right answers at the USDA and Mills County, Iowa animal control authority office’s "not."

My friend, named Dam Pissed, is very joyful about the future of this Mills County, Iowa tyranny taxation of all the dogs in the rural county (especially any dog that never leaves the inside of their house), by your alleged agro-biz-incorporated sponsored "welfare" county business, of "not” raising dogs" in family homes on private property in the rural areas of this county." I also heard that you just essentially ‘copied’ the tyranny animal care and control ordinance from a neighboring county of Mills? Did you not know how to properly write animal care and control legislation that would actually be ‘fair’ to dog owners in the county? Was it really necessary to plagiarize tyranny animal control laws from someone else?

My friend, named DAM PISSED, has been raising his family dogs for twenty years or so, and the best he ever made on them was $422 in a county dog show prize award in 1988. Until this year 2009, when he got two subsidy checks for $1000 each for "not" raising any dogs anymore, from your USDA and his neighboring county in Iowa by their sponsored animal care, taxation, and control programs "not." 

If I can get $1000 (like my friend DAM PISSED) for each "not" raised family dog on my private property in Mills County, Iowa like my friend allegedly did in his county, then if I “not” raise 50 dogs on my private property in Mills County, Iowa will I get a bigger check of subsidy? For example, can I get $2000 for “not” raising 100 dogs, as long as I do "not" license them, and register them with the new National Animal Identification System (NAIS) "not"? 

Also, with the bad economy and high price of food now days, I am considering the "not” raising cows or hogs animal control program on family private property that the USDA and various Iowa Counties also sponsor from all those "not" so interested independent farmers “not” making any money on their family farms. I think they call them "mad cow" family operations don't they, so please send me any information you have on that subsidy program in Mills County, Iowa also for “not” raising those family pets or animals also. 

In view of these circumstances, Sires, you understand that I am now totally unemployed and that I have no money to pay for all these new ‘tyranny’ dog license taxes for “not” raising any dogs, pets or animals on my private property in Mills County, Iowa. There for I plan to file for Iowa State Unemployment and Federal Government food stamps also, while I am "not" raising all these NAIS and Mills County, Iowa controlled animals.

Sires, after you have began to tax me and my dogs, pets, and animals “to death” for simply owning my own dogs, pets or animals in your fine establishment of a county in Iowa with all these new animal care and control laws "not" will you subsidize my ‘burial” of pet ownership also?

Be assured, Sires, you all will have my VOTE in the coming elections for YOUR re-election. NOT!

Patriotic-ally Yours, 

Mr. Dog Smith, “A Man who just owns a pet dog inside his home as his family”. 

PS. Please notify me when you are giving out free Iowa surplus corn and cheese, from the independent animal home owners and farmers you run out of business by your tyranny animal taxation laws. 

PPS: TO ALL AMERICANS; For "Real" folks; Just VOTE, "NO" to Deadwood County, and State Politicians, who won't say "NO" to NAIS or the USDA or to STOP Anti-Pet, animal care and control county taxation and tyranny animal laws, spay/neuter to avoid taxation tyranny requirements, and unlawful and unconstitutional animal care and control legislation that does “not” provide “due process” for a pet owner before animal control can confiscate, seize or euthanize your dogs. This county has approved animal care and control regulations with an agenda to end American's freedoms and liberties to freely own animals and pets without government intrusion or violation of the U.S. Constitution and that is appalling! 

PPPS: Also, Stop the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) to "protect" America from corporate - government intervention into American's U.S. Constitutional freedoms on your "own" private property with animals called a premises.

PPPPS: Stop any and all perverted Anti-Pet Ownership ordinances, spay/neuter license requirements, and mandatory taxation for animal owner control legislation/laws that take away your rights to freely own and maintain your pets and dogs on your own private property. 

And by the way, please tell Mills County, Iowa...

"We the People Have the Right to Bear F.arms!" 

...AND OWN OUR DOGS, PETS AND ANIMALS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INTRUSION!

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

USDA has classified PETA as a "Terrorist Threat"

NationalDogPress ©

by Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc. (Nonprofit)

USDA has classified PETA as a "Terrorist Threat"

 

5 Dec 09, 03:55

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) has been classified as a “terrorist threat” in a document created by the USDA.

 

 

The USDA created a new “APHIS Facility Security Profile” form to send to animal experimentation facilities.

 

 

Unidentified recipients were asked to answer about their experiences, and return the form to the government so the USDA can better meet their needs.

 

 

In one section of the form, PETA is listed as a “domestic special interest terrorist.”

 

 

Does this mean that PETA is now known as "People for Extermination and Terrorist Activities?

Source:  Green is the New Red

 

© NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, © NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Hoe and Change! Obama's State Dinner Gate

  
  
 - Satire - 

 

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2010,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

 

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Polk County, Iowa are not logical or valid – Will You Help Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?

 

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Polk County, Iowa are not logical or valid – Will You Help Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?

Dog number limit ordinances in Polk County will lead to a decrease in pet licensing taxes by scared dog owners who are over the dog limit imposed.

 

POLK COUNTY, Iowa, 2 December 09 (NationalDogPress) --

Dogs and dog owners face more discrimination than ever before in American society, and now specifically in Polk County, Iowa for no apparent reason other than to enforce tyranny in dog “number limits” upon animal owners who appropriately take care of their dogs in their homes and on their private property in Polk County, Iowa.

Specifically, this Investigative Reporter has interviewed, Meaghan Potter-Lynch, a 19 year old, and upstanding citizen of Polk County who proudly owns and properly maintains the love, care and control of their dogs and goats at their residence in Polk County, Iowa.  Meaghan now is allegedly faced with having “all” the animals confiscated, for no other reason than for Animal Control to allegedly enforce their tyranny animal control “number limits” upon the good people of Polk County.

Meaghan stated to this Investigator, “All of my animals are up to date on shots, feed and watered properly, housed properly and loved more than anything in the world. “

It is alleged that Animal Control Authorities in Polk County, have “threatened” to confiscate “ALL” of Meaghan’s animals, when in actuality, animal control has apparently informed Meaghan that the “number limit” ordinance “allows” Meaghan to maintain three dogs on her property.  This allegedly appears to be “intimidation” by animal control, to get control of the people, thru the animal’s confiscation or alleged “threat” of total animal seizure, be told.

While local, city, county, state, and federal entities pay lip service to the dog as man’s best friend by passing tyranny dog limiting ordinances and laws, We the People as a whole community, and specifically in the community of Polk County, Iowa, have allowed fear and politics of their “Animal Control” and their “Animal Authorities” to run rampant (with citizens being unaware) by this alleged threat of tyranny animal enforcement to seize “ALL” of Meaghan’s animals on private property potentially resulting in a “total animal confiscation” of Meaghan’s “Intrinsic Valued” and beloved dogs and goats on their private property.   

This “real threat” of Animal Control Authorities allegedly “intimidating” Meaghan will determine the parameters of dog ownership based upon emotions not logic and common sense in law making for all citizens in Polk County, Iowa. 

Based upon the allegations of animal control to Meaghan and her dogs, and soon to possibly be (the same treatment) to the other citizens and residents of Polk County, Iowa, will the Polk County community “stand together” to fight off this tyranny of animal control or “fail” to get involved, -- and subsequently, each Polk County citizen, one by one, by one, will lose their animals in total, (each dog and every animal owner) in due time, in Polk County via “number limits” tyranny enforcement?  

This type of “number limit” control of the animals in Polk County, will leave their beloved dogs, pets, and animals, to be dealt with as “nothing” of value, other than being an animal having no more value than that of “chattel”.

Will the oppressor controlling all “number limits’ and animals in Polk County, Iowa become the hand of the “Mark of the Beast” in care, and control regardless of whether the citizens in Polk County, Iowa are properly maintaining their care and control of their dogs, pets, and animals on their own private property?

Time will surely tell, sooner rather than later, starting with Meaghan Potter-Lynch.

 

My question to the citizens of Polk County, Iowa who own pets and animals is:

Dog ordinance 'number limits' in Polk County, Iowa are not logical or valid – Will You Help Meaghan Potter-Lynch and their Dogs Fight This Animal Control Tyranny?

We the People, spend hundreds of millions of dollars on premium foods, veterinary care, toys, kennels, pet sitters, training classes, and more even while limiting the number and type of dogs an owner can house. We use dogs to aid in catching criminals, search for victims of crimes and natural disasters, help handicapped humans, and provide emotional support even while barring dogs from communities if they exceed a certain weight, certain breed to be banned, or limits to the number of dogs allowed in a home even if they are properly cared for and loved as family.

 

The disadvantages of 'dog number' limits in homes are:

Dog owners in some communities face a limit on the number of pets they can own, but these limits, too, are counterproductive.

Laws that criminalize pet ownership based on numbers alone have been declared unconstitutional in some states because they do not address the need to control nuisances or provide for the health and safety of residents.

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, the state’s highest court, has declared such a law unconstitutional in that state, citing a precedent in Kadash v City of Williamsport:

“What is not an infringement upon public safety and is not a nuisance cannot be made one by legislative fiat and then prohibited....

“Even legitimate legislative goals cannot be pursued by means which stifle fundamental personal liberty when the goals can otherwise be more reasonably achieved.”

A dog or pet limit ordinance is difficult to enforce without increased presence of animal control or police agencies and often leads to a decrease in pet licensing to prevent cross-referencing of license records. If the law is enforced only upon complaint, it becomes just another law for people to circumvent and further erodes confidence in legislative bodies.

Numbers have no relationship to nuisances. A person with one dog that runs loose or barks all night is a greater nuisance than a person with a dozen dogs that are quiet, clean, and kept at home.

Limiting people to four dogs (or fewer) puts an unreasonable strain on people who raise show dogs, compete in performance trials, participate in canine rescue operations, foster dogs for service dog organizations, etc. and can lead to those responsible dog owners leaving the community.

A number limit causes dog deaths by forcing people to give up dogs they own, thus causing crowding in local shelters; denying people the opportunity to buy an additional dog from a shelter or a rescue; and adversely impacting rescue groups and foster homes that help find new homes for dogs whose owners cannot keep them.

Alternatives to number limits are: 

• Passage and enforcement of strict nuisance laws.
• Use of an arbitrator to mediate neighborhood disputes about animals.
• Use of alternative sentencing such as community service at the county animal shelter or attendance at a full obedience training course for those who violate nuisance ordinances.
• Periodic programs or mailings about responsible dog ownership or city sponsorship of a Canine Good Citizen test to encourage residents to be responsible dog owners. 

Animal laws are not always a result of state and federal battles. Squabbles between neighbors often erupt over animals, squabbles that often spill over into law enforcement or animal control filed complaints to local governments.  

As an emotional result the local government greases the squeaky wheel complaints by citizens with even more stricter ordinances or other tacked on to the zoning code or the criminal codes to existing animal ordinances.

Dog limit ordinances are often passed out of frustration, with little consideration for the consequences or valid and factual basis to make any “positive or constructive” benefit to the community dog complaints, other than a government official “feel good” action giving We the People even more tyranny in our local animal control ordinances.

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925


Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Alaska Fisherman's Take on Sarah Palin - No Holds Barred

 

Subject: Alaska Fisherman's Take on Sarah Palin - No Holds Barred

Dewey Whetsell a longtime commercial fisherman, veteran fire fighter and fire chief, jazz musician, and poet from Alaska penned a very nice retort to all of those who would say Sarah Palin isn't the real deal, a true leader.

Those who follow Alaska politics know these stories well, but the rest of America should understand this as well.

Here is Dewey's letter:

No matter where you fall in the wide spectrum of thought on Sarah Palin's ability and as a person, I think this really captures the essence of what she did as Governor of Alaska. I tend personally to admire her if for no other reason than she sends the left into a blind paroxysm of pure HATRED toward her. It always makes me laugh when adults start foaming at the mouth for no good reason.

By Dewie Whetsell, Alaskan Fisherman.

(As posted in comments on Greta's article referencing the MOVEON ad about Sarah Palin.)

The last 45 of my 66 years I've spent in a commercial fishing town in Alaska .  I understand Alaska politics but never understood national politics well until this last year.  Here's the breaking point: Neither side of the Palin controversy gets it.  It's not about persona, style, rhetoric, it's about doing things.  Even Palin supporters never mention the things that I'm about to mention here.

1- Democrats forget when Palin was the "Darling of the Democrats" because as soon as Palin took the Governor's office away from a fellow Republican and tough SOB, Frank Murkowski, she tore into the Republican's "Corrupt Bastards Club" (CBC) and sent them packing. Many of them are now residing in State housing and wearing orange jump suits. The Democrats reacted by skipping around the yard, throwing confetti and singing, "la la la la" (well, you know how they are). Name another governor in this country that has ever done anything similar. But while you're thinking, I'll continue.

2- Now with the CBC gone, there were fewer Alaskan politicians to protect the huge, giant oil companies here. So, she constructed and enacted a new system of splitting the oil profits called "ACES." Exxon (the biggest corporation in the world) protested and Sarah told them, "don't let the door hit you in the stern on your way out." They stayed, and Alaska residents went from being merely wealthy to being filthy rich. Of course, the other huge international oil companies meekly fell in line. Again, give me the name of any other governor in the country that has done anything similar.

3- The other thing she did when she walked into the governor's office is she got the list of State requests for federal funding for projects, known as "pork." She went through the list, took 85% of them and placed them in he "when-hell-freezes-over" stack. She let locals know that if we need something built, we'll pay for it ourselves. Maybe she figured she could use the money she got from selling the previous governor's jet because it was extravagant. Maybe she could use the money she saved by dismissing the governor's cook (remarking that she could cook for her own family), giving back the State vehicle issued to her, maintaining that she already had a car, and dismissing her State provided security force (never mentioning - I imagine - that she's packing heat herself). I'm still waiting to hear the names of those other governors.

4- Now, even with her much-ridiculed "gosh and golly" mannerism, she also managed to put together a totally new approach to getting a natural gas pipeline built which will be the biggest private construction project in the history of North America. No one else could do it although they tried. If that doesn't impress you, then you're trying too hard to be unimpressed while watching her do things like this while baking up a batch of brownies with her other hand.

5- For 30 years, Exxon held a lease to do exploratory drilling at a place called Point Thompson. They made excuses the entire time why they couldn't start drilling. In truth they were holding it like an investment. No governor for 30 years could make them get started. This summer, she told them she was revoking their lease and kicking them out. They protested and threatened court action. She shrugged and reminded them that she knew the way to the court house.  Alaska won again!

6- President Obama wants the nation to be on 25% renewable resources for electricity by 2025. Sarah went to the legislature and submitted her plan for Alaska to be at 50% renewables by 2025. We are already at 25%. I can give you more specifics about things done, as opposed to style and persona. Everybody wants to be cool, sound cool, look cool. But that's just a cover-up. I'm still waiting to hear from liberals the names of other governors who can match what mine has done in two and a half years. I won't be holding my breath. By the way, she was content to return to AK after the national election and go to work, but the haters wouldn't let her. Now these adolescent screechers are obviously not scuba divers. And no one ever told them what happens when you continually jab and pester a barracuda. Without warning, it will spin around and tear your face off. Shoulda known better.

You have just read the truth about Sarah Palin that sends the media, along with the democrat party, into a wild uncontrolled frenzy to discredit her. I guess they are only interested in skirt chasers, dishonesty, immoral people, liars, womanizers, murderers, and bitter ex-presidents' wive.

So "You go Girl." I only wish the men in Washington had your guts, determination, honesty, and morals.

I rest my case.

Only FOOLS listen to the biased media.

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Why I don't go to church without my dog

 

Why I don't go to church without my dog

Depend on God and Dog – That is my Church of Religion involving the Dogs!

28 Nov 09

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress 

The “WORD” of the Bible in many forms, contains various descriptive uses of the term “Dog” but in reality of our Lord and God, the true meaning and existence of a “Dog” has been taken out of context by religion, churches, or even in the descriptions in the Bible. In order to begin an accurate discussion on this topic, we must first examine what descriptions of the term “Dog” are actually in the Bible. I provide many of these Bible descriptions in excerpts as follows:

 

“Dog” references in the Bible

The watch of the house, and of the flock (Isaiah 56:10-11; Job 30:1) … which fall from their master's table." More commonly owner-less, and banded in troops which divide cities into so many quarters; each half-starved, ravenous troop keeps to its own quarter, and drives off any intruder; feeding on blood, dead bodies, and offal; therefore regarded as "unclean" (1 Kings 14:11; 1 Kings 16:4; 1 Kings 21:19; 1 Kings 21:23; 1 Kings 22:38; 2 Kings 9:10; 2 Kings 9:35-36)

Their dismal howling at night are alluded to in Psalm 59:6; Psalm 59:14-15; "they return at evening, they make a noise like a dog, and go round about the city"; perhaps in allusion to Saul's agents thirsting for David's blood coming to Michal's house at evening, and to the retribution on Saul in kind, when he who had made David a wanderer himself wandered about seeking vainly for help against the Philistines, and went at last by night to the witch of Endor. As unclean (Isaiah 66:3) … dog, dead dog, dog's head, are terms of scorn or else self-abasement (1 Samuel 24:14; 2 Samuel 3:8; 2 Samuel 9:8; 2 Samuel 16:9; 2 Kings 8:13)

A wanton, self-prostituting man is called a "dog" (Deuteronomy 23:18)

One Egyptian god had a dog form. "Beware of the (Greek) dogs," those impure persons of whom I told you often" (Philemon 3:2; Philemon 3:18-19)

…dogs in filthiness, snarling, and ferocity against the Lord and His people (Psalm 22:16; Psalm 22:20)

… Backsliding into former carnality, as the dog "is turned to his own vomit again" (2 Peter 2:22)

The Jews regarded the Gentiles as "dogs," but by unbelief they ceased to be the true Israel and themselves became dogs (Isaiah 56:10-11) "Deliver my darling from the power of the dog."

Not only are there many references or descriptions to the term “Dog” in the Bible, but in many other faiths and their writings as well all over the globe, to include African Mythology as follows:

"Juok and the Dog That Preserved Mankind (Anuak/Sudan)". Juok (Jwok), the creator, the Supreme Being, was an androgynous god, an all-powerful and omniscient spirit. He had sons—first an elephant; then a buffalo, a lion, a crocodile; after that, a little dog; and, finally, man and woman. When he saw the humans, beings without hair, Juok told the dog to throw them away. The dog took the humans to a tree, and put the children into a hole in that tree. Then, without his knowledge, the dog milked a cow from among God's herds and fed the children. The children grew up, got too big for the tree, so the dog took them to the country, where they built a house. They became a man and a woman. (Excerpt from: A Dictionary of African Mythology, Author, Harold Scheub) 

Could this be where the term, “DOG” can be spelling reversed into the meaning of “GOD”?

DOG vs. GOD in reverse spelling

The spelling reversal of the term “DOG” into meaning “GOD” has been a sore spot among Christians, Islam, Muslims, and other religions or faiths for a very long time.  I have seen many of the weary skeptics who thought the healing of humans thru a personal interaction with a dog was just a “dog and pony” show to draw people into a group or even a church.  I have found since, there is some truth in my skepticism, but like anything else, one bad apple doesn’t mean that the rest of them are bad - unless it is left unattended to, then it will eventually spread rot throughout the entire basket of life.  Jesus warned us about such teachings -- He used yeast as His example, how it takes such a little amount to work its way through the dough making it impure (Lk 12:1-3 & Matt 16:12). 

My contention and message here is that there are many types of "Dog Value Doubters" and “Dog Haters” in this world, and even in many religions and faiths who claim to be of God. An example of this wrongful “hatred” of dogs can easily be found in Islam, Muslims, and many Animal Rights groups as well.

 

The health and wealth messages preached but fail to speak about the dogs

By some , these above groups or religions have left a bad image toward something God has intended as a great and wonderful gift - THE DOG.  To some, whenever the words faith and healing are said in the same sentence as a dog, it is usually dismissed as one of those tongue talking health and wealth or animal fanatics.

Having been raised in a conservative church, I am aware that there is not much tolerance for any type of "healing" except that of their “WORD” of the Church you attend, and their “WORD” rarely if ever includes the extended family of humans, called “The Dog.”  The DOG is a valid source of healing one’s spirit, soul, and body thru the interaction of a dog with the human.  I have visited many congregations in churches that preach health and wealth in their churches and couldn’t get past all the hype, glitter, performance, and racket, and lack of caring for any animals, and specifically the “dog” as a true "intrinsic value" to life. 

The two most common beliefs that seem to rub people the wrong way, and have for many years, are the health and prosperity movements - “Health and Wealth” or “Name it and Claim it”, also known as Animal Rights movements, that promote “vegetarianism” and the “hatred” for humans to freely own pets and maintain animals in their care and control.  These Animal Rights and animal hater religious or political movements have become primary reasons why so many religious believers are cautious about even the thought of healing outside of a physician’s care, let alone the healing power of the love and caring for an innocent animal like the dog.  

What a shame to discount the dog's power to heal, regardless of the means of healing it is still God who does the healing and he does so thru the power of the innocence, interaction, and love in the “dog”.  At one end of the spectrum there are those who do not believe in physicians, hospitals, or medicine, or animal healing, etc.  At the other end are those who put all their faith solely in physicians, hospitals, medicine, etc., yet still none in the dog.  Yet they both still do not look to healing their bodies, spirits and souls thru companionship with a good and loving dog as a healing therapy.

It may be God’s will for us to go through an illness or a disease, if not for our own good, maybe for the good of another.  We are called to be the light and salt. (Mt 5:13-14)  If we spend time grumbling about being ill we may miss the purpose and the blessing God has for us.  There is nothing wrong with turning to God saying, “I don’t know the purpose, nor do I like the illness, but help me understand, give me the strength and understanding to persevere in doing your will not mine.” And then each of us needs to turn to “man’s best friend” for the healing power of the dog. 

We shouldn’t try to under estimate God’s purpose for our lives, if we think shallow, shallow is where we’ll stay, and if we think only of ourselves, selfishness is a lonely place. But when we are lacking in our ability to control our lives, either because of monetary, health, or wellness issues, we need to start the “healing” process by turning our selfishness for “serving our own needs and wants” to serving our Lord and Master, by turning our attentions to our dogs as their Master in the humble image of God-like tendencies and behavior, Faith, Love, and Charity, or if you don’t have a dog, then turn you attention to helping other dogs in need in order for you to receive their healing power. This is the path to true healing power of God, thru a Dog.

Healing is not a "dog and pony" show -- it is real.  It comes in different ways and at different times, but we must not limit God because of someone else’s over zealous flamboyant ways "putting down" the dogs.  God desires to heal us. We should not let other religions, “Animal Rights”, or perverted” Animal Laws and religions or their agendas to stifle our personal healing thru the unselfish love, care, and control of our ownership of a dog.

 

Canine comfort that has healing power is my religion

Canine comforts, known in the mental health profession as “therapets,” are providing "wordless" warmth, a brief respite for emotionally bankrupted victims. Dogs do have a healing power, even more than any religion or wealth. Dogs don't ask anything of you. They don't ask you any questions; they don't give you any advice. They are just there for you." It’s very healing to the dog owner.

With the dogs in therapy either personally with your own dog or with a trained therapy dog; for a few minutes you forget your monetary troubles, mental health troubles, illnesses or disease healed.  The dogs provide something that a preacher or religion just can't provide. The healing powers of animals (especially dogs) for troubled people have reduced levels of stress, depression, and even their heart risk. A dog owner finds needed happiness and well-being through this primal connection of caring for the dog.  The reverse spelling of this "word" meets the definition: "Dog" reversed means "God" in my book. Even desperately ill patients respond to this unorthodox but legitimate therapy - a cold wet nose and a furry cuddle of a dog or a puppy means as the power to heal.

Even Cambridge, England, researchers discovered that, within a month of taking a cat or dog into their home, new owners reported a "highly significant" reduction in minor ailments.

The Baker Medical Research Institute in Melbourne, Australia, showed that the health benefits were more far-reaching still. A study of some 6000 patients revealed that those with pets had lower blood pressure, a lower cholesterol level and, as a result, a diminished risk of heart attack. And American researchers have established that, even after a heart attack, dog owners are more likely than other coronary patients to be alive a year later.

The reasons are simple, experts say. Pets (especially dogs) help us reduce our state of arousal, which reduces blood pressure. We are fulfilling our most primitive and basic need - the need to touch.

Dr Yokoyama Akimitsu, head of the psychiatric unit at Kyosai Tachikawa Hospital in Tokyo, says pets can also help us by making us feel less lonely, by creating a feeling of being needed and by encouraging social contact with others interested in animals. They are also a stimulus for healthy exercise, keep us busy and make us feel safe. 

For some people, animals can provide more consistent emotional support than humans. A Warwich University, England, study found that people who are poor at confiding in others, showing love or making friends were able to lavish affection on a pet. 

Whether we pamper our pets or depend on them, few of us would quarrel with the World Health Organization's pronouncement that companion creatures bring us immense benefits. But for some, this comes as a revelation.

 

The healing power of dogs

A famous dog quote but still very true: "There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face."

All pet owners know the health benefits of having pets. It's those that do not own one that still need to be convinced. For thousands of years, humans and dogs have co-existed with each other for mutual benefits. However; for humans, the medical benefits of having a dog around maybe more profound.  In 1962, child psychologist Boris Levinson reported significant improvement in several of his clients when he began bringing his dog Jingles to work with him. The defined the use of the first therapy dog which was Jingles, who accidentally walked into the job due to his master, Dr. Boris Levinson. Dr. Levinson, a psychologist, noticed that he was able to reach a disturbed child when the dog, Jingles, was present. 

I am sure we have "not" all heard it time and time again. Having a pet adds to healing power. When people first get cats, or dogs,they always love having them around, but they could not quite grasp the concept that they are good for their health and why. A dog is truly a man's best friend, in more ways than one. Not only do these furry friends provide companionship and unconditional love, by owning a dog but they also have many positive health benefits. Although most dog lovers have long professed the medical benefits of dog ownership, it has been only a few years since reputable medical associations have studied this canine/human relationship with an eye toward understanding their healing power. 

The Power of Love and Companionship

Using dogs for healing, therapy, companionship, or emotional support is not a new thing in our world. But what has become new is the extent of its popularity and success rates in the United States, Canada, and the world.

What I hope to achieve by this article is to "awaken" people to the power of the “WORD” (DOG) to let each person who reads this article to finally discover the power of the healing power religion of “The Dog.” You may never look at your dog the same way again after reading this article!

 

Now I can finally explain why I don't go to church without my dog

 "When any government, it’s laws, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its citizens, church members, or loyal  subjects, the following “WORDS” –  “This you may not read”, or “this you must not see”, or “this you are forbidden to know”, then the end result is “tyranny” and “oppression” no matter how holy the motives or good the intentions are of the government, the law, or the religion in its “execution” of its agenda to care for and control it’s people, and that of its care and control of pets and animals in society, under the perverted legal term called “humane" or "animal health.”

A man or woman who becomes a lover of dogs starts a healing process not equaled by any religion or physician, when their concerns, cares and responsibilities place the dog on the same level as their favorite cherished property or item within their home.  My Meaning, is that he/she will search high and low for that special property that has been lost or misplaced.  But with a dog, there is even more of a spiritual, and now a legal bond more than just a piece of property. A Dog now has a personal, judicial and legal “Intrinsic Value” and can no longer be considered just a piece of meaningless property like “Chattel.”

Once a dog lover always a dog lover, no matter whether the circumstances of his/her “after” life compel him/her to love them from afar. The dog is the better for it and so are the man or the woman, and even the child. My advice is to “buy your son or daughter, or yourself a dog”. 

The dog's "Intrinsic Value" to your lives, cannot be overstated.

 

The “Dog” isn’t the bad guy for being referred to in reverse spelling as “God”- People are.

In summary, regarding my “religion of the dog” statements, I say: Preserve
common sense” in your "Kindness" to all owner's animals, and kindness for each other in society by not 'over-reacting' to dog attacks being promoted in “propaganda” media attacks to obtain 'bad' animal care and control legislation. It's that simple. It will make the world a better place for each of us if we only give our dog's love, teach them kindness for each of us and each other, and give kindness to all animals, with a chance to thrive in preserving dog and pet "Intrinsic Value" in ownership with lawful freedom on our own private property with responsibility. And we need to allow the newly defined “religion of the dog” to take hold in your own home to begin the healing process. God bless our dogs, and their power to heal our troubles and pain.

I Say: “A man's religion is not worth its salt, if his dogs are not the better for it.” AMEN!

###

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Nebraska Humane Society Executes 400 + cats this year, so far

NationalDogPress © by Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc. (Nonprofit)

Nebraska Humane Society Executes 400 + cats this year, so far

2009-11-25 OMAHA, Nebraska (NationalDogPress) --

The Nebraska Humane Society says this year's cat situation is even worse than usual.

The Nebraka Humane Society reports it has too many cats and has been forced to euthanize an alleged substantial amount of the cats in their facility.

Spokeswoman Pam Wiese says the society has killed more than 400 cats so far this year.

She says that every year the society ends up euthanizing "perfectly healthy, adoptable cats, simply because we get too many in,"

Wiese says cats corralled as strays aren't picked up by their owners as routinely as are dogs. More cats are coming in from outside the area, and she says the shelter has even more kittens than usual.

Extra efforts to adopt out the cats have not kept up the number coming in.

The society has signs in its 24-hour drop-off area that tell people any cats they drop off are likely to be euthanized.

The Nebraska Humane Society is alleged to be "far from" any consideration as being noted for any "no -kill" option in their "humane society."

Bottom Line: If you are a cat in the Nebraska Humane Society, the chances are you are "going to be executed."

 · Return to Website ·

© Copyright 2009 NationalDogPress News

Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit)

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


PLEASE DONATE to Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) BY CLICKING ON THE PAYPAL LINK BELOW:

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=6721925

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 
Legal Disclaimer: The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 
Copyright © 2006-2009,  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization Incorporated (Non-Profit) Iowa 2009, NationalDogPress News, All Rights Reserved

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage; Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government

Dog Licensing Is An Outrage Your Pet Belongs to You, Not the Government by Dean A. Ayers        The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA Today. We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals. Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions: Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking. A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USA the licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal. Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:” Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept. Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world. A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds: Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979). Doing Away with Dog Ownership: All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto, and those of us who have traditionally grown our own food or owned animals personally for various reasons will be locked out or the owners will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc. Read the rest of the article Copyright © 2009 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Org. Inc.